#願榮光歸香港 #反送中 #反警暴 #新屋嶺
由陳同佳在台殺人案，香港最高權力的黐線婆林鄭月娥假裝對死者潘ｘｘ同情要為她取回公道，而借意推一條逃犯引渡條例向狗雜種獻媚而引發軒然大波；由本年六月九日到如今反對抗爭不斷，而柒婆要平息這場因自己性格剛愎自用、無能和死不認輸而引來政治風暴的方法是靠黑警、黑大陸公安和黑社會合力打殺捕市民，以為暴力可勝一切，721警隱身而仆街何君堯策動黑社會恐襲手無寸鐵市民後，黑警暴力開始升級，引發831黑警突衝入太子站月台見人就打，趕傳媒到地面關閘，令太子站頓成人間煉獄死傷無數，港鐵再封站2天毀屍滅跡後索性封了太子B1及對面出口；人們要求港鐵交出當晚CCTV，但港鐵左推右搪，港鐵正式在市民心目中改名為「黨」鐵，專以用作運黑警、畜膿小隊、大陸狗公安到各區打人殺人及關站圍堵市民和阻礙遊行，B1站每天大量途人送花燒撒紙錢祭弔死難者，因毗鄰旺角「狗竇」，晚晚也有黑警在狗竇用電筆照射途人作挑釁行為，因此太子站晚晚也開PARTY到一兩點，查原因或是他們做了殺人事件，在午夜無人陪的話會極度不安所以才作出挑釁行為，912凌晨更聽到唸經打齋聲音從太子站內傳出，太子站真沒死人？誰信！
而黑警的另一人間煉獄就是新屋嶺了，據聞那人間煉獄發生女性被拘押者遭黑警或大陸狗公安強姦、輪姦、遭染性病或被殺；男性被拘押者也遭性侵雞姦（屌屎窟）及虐打致亡，據聞為數共有73名男女殉難，往後很多離奇的屍體發現（被投海、被跳樓、被自殺），而凸手柒婆一直神隱而間中會出來為毀壞了的黨鐵設施、血腥月經旗痛心疾首，而未曾對任何一條血血肉肉的市民生命掉過一滴鱷魚眼淚，香港人有林鄭月娥為首帶領的鄭若驊、李家超、盧偉聰、鄧炳強、劉業成等一眾狗官「臀」隊真需要自求多福。
黑警惡行罄竹難書，更滲入天量大陸狗公安，在痴婆林鄭與一班廢差角頭劉業成、鄧炳強、盧偉聰及中聯辦等垃圾狗共官員沆瀣一氣下，香港由六月九日到今頓成人間煉獄，黑警人人幪面，無委任證，隻隻「畜」勢待發，個個面目猙獰有如ZOMBIE，人人望之不似人君兇神惡煞，肆意與市民鬥嘴，辱罵途人：『死暴徒』、『曱甴』、『垃圾』；從這點已看出這類幪了面後的大陸狗或毅進仔，在警權突然擴大後，自以為的紀律「暴」隊及大陸哩心裡面那種不自知的自卑感澎漲為對香港人的仇視，盡情打、殺、捕、姦，而大陸人（尤其軍佬）多患性病（與林鄭（又稱淋病）非常合拍），現在更是有目的地專抓捕大量少女或孕婦（因她們在人羣中稍弱或有顧忌更或有需要），你們想作甚麼？不言而喻！土共的卑劣手段並非止於此，香港人亦不會「赦」你班大陸狗賊；黑警更控制了黨鐵，營業時間任其安排或封站，更有黑警換黑衫幪面在封了站的閘內破壞黨鐵入閘機及蓄意縱火燒站來想嫁禍市民，黑警及解放狗四處喬裝市民姦淫擄掠肆無忌憚地破壞以圖逆轉市民對警隊的信任（有９５％市民對警隊評為０分）；有云：『天要其亡，先讓其狂』，盡情狂吧！
到今已抗爭了近120天，香港政府就如陽具一樣，只懂向前一個方向抽插，還引用1922年英殖時期的方案－－緊急法（10月05 00：00先出禁幪面法，因最大是牠自己，再來就可禁網、禁電話、抄你家、黑差隨便入屋搜查、宵禁、趕人走．．．）來想翻盤，絕看不到政府上下（包括建制派議員）有一個官員的智力和智商是沒有問題的，這也難怪，就連偉大的所謂中國國家領導人也是小學程度扮博士而已，所以，德微而位尊，無禍者鮮矣！
願榮光歸香港
作曲：Thomas dgx yhl
作詞：T，眾連登仔
編曲：T,BP,CLK
何以這土地淚再流，何以令眾人亦憤恨，
昂首拒默沉，吶喊聲響透，盼自由歸於這裡。
何以這恐懼抹不走，何以為信念從沒退後，
何解血在流但邁進聲響透，建自由光輝香港。
在晚星墜落徬徨午夜，迷霧裡最遠處吹來號角聲，捍自由來齊集這裡，
來全力抗對，勇氣智慧也永不滅。
黎明來到要光復這香港，同行兒女為正義時代革命，
祈求民主與自由，萬世都不朽，我願榮光歸香港。
－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
紀文鳳
Chairman, I have been a corporate CEO and employer for over30 years, and I have interviewed and hired hundreds of people in the past. But never in my life have I encountered a candidate who will overtly and recklessly discuss his or her potential employment at any stage of the recruitment process. This in fact is already in breach of confidentiality.
It is most unfortunate that the candidate recommended by the University Search Committee has never been tabled at this Council for deliberation. In our view we are actually doing it according to procedures.
I am in support of press freedom and also in sympathy with the candidate who defended himself against the criticism of some media. But apparently he has gone too far, to create controversy and use external and internal forces, directly or indirectly to lobby, pre-claim, coerce, intimidate, fabricate and sometimes even threaten Council members to approve his appointment. I myself was a victim on February12th this year when I was accused by a local newspaper for stalling his appointment at this Council. I then have to issue a public statement to clarify that the Council has not even started to discuss this appointment. This is just one incidence among many, and to me, all these tactics in fact are interferences in the University affairs at the highest level.
As members of the Council, and also trustee of the University, we are professionals with our independent judgment and ethics. We do our assessment based on the…… interests of HKU and the community at large. Given that position of the pro-vice-chancellor is responsible for academic recruitment and resources, the pro-vice-chancellor should be a role model for all, staff and students included. So I have strong reservation about the recommended candidate's integrity. And I would not accept the recommendation. Thank you.
資料來源：互聯網
來源轉自：
（注意：帖內文或圖片中可能含有厭惡性簡體字；本站維護中華文化，堅決行使正體字。版權歸著者所有。）
【其他．相關】：
